Site Map Icon
RSS Feed icon
 
 
 
September 25, 2017

"I have no ambition in this world but one, and that is to be a fireman. The position may, in the eyes of some, appear to be a lowly one; but we who know the work which the fireman has to do believe that his is a noble calling. Our proudest moment is to save lives. Under the impulse of such thoughts, the nobility of the occupation thrills us and stimulates us to deeds of daring, even of supreme sacrifice."

 
Chief Edward F. Croker, FDNY
circa 1910



Weingarten Rights
Updated On: Sep 06, 2009

Weingarten Rights

EMPLOYEE'S RIGHT TO UNION REPRESENTATION

The rights of unionized employees to have present a union representative during investigatory interviews were announced by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 1975 case (NLRB vs. Weingarten, Inc. 420 U.S. 251, 88 LRRM 2689). These rights have become known as the Weingarten rights.

Employees have Weingarten rights only during investigatory interviews. An investigatory interview occurs when a supervisor questions an employee to obtain information which could be used as a basis for discipline or asks an employee to defend his or her conduct.

If an employee has a reasonable belief that discipline or other adverse consequences may result from what he or she says, the employee has the right to request union representation. Management is not required to inform the employee of his/her Weingarten rights; it is the employees responsibility to know and request.

When the employee makes the request for a union representative to be present management has three options:
(I) it can stop questioning until the representative arrives.
(2) it can call off the interview or,
(3) it can tell the employee that it will call off the interview unless the employee voluntarily gives up his/her rights to a union representative (an option the emplovee should always refuse.)

Employers will often assert that the only role of a union representative in an investigatory interview is to observe the discussion. The Supreme Court, however, clearly acknowledges a representative's right to assist and counsel workers during the interview.

The Supreme Court has also ruled that during an investigatory interview management must inform the union representative of the subject of the interrogation. The representative must also be allowed to speak privately with the employee before the interview. During the questioning, the representative can interrupt to clarify a question or to object to confusing or intimidating tactics.

While the interview is in progress the representative can not tell the employee what to say but he may advise them on how to answer a question. At the end of the interview the union representative can add information to support the employee's case.


Member Login
Username:

Password:


Not registered yet?
Click Here to sign-up

Forgot Your Login?
<< September 2017 >>
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Upcoming Events
No Events Found

Department Email Log-In

Important Links
Visit www.iaff.org!
Visit www.fpfp.org!
Visit aflcio.org!
Visit www.fldfs.com/SFM!
Visit www.nfpa.org!
Visit www.usfa.dhs.gov!
Visit www.firehero.org!
Visit www.mda.org!
Visit www.jems.com!
Visit www.thefirestore.com!
Visit www.floridaforestservice.com/index.html!
Visit www.myfrs.com!
Visit www.firehouse.com!
Polk County Website
Hardee County Website
OSHA
MyFlorida.com
Firefighter Close Calls
Florida Workers Comp
Target Saftey
 
 
IAFF Local 3471
Copyright © 2017, All Rights Reserved.
Powered By UnionActive™

110270 hits since Jan 22, 2007
Visit Unions-America.com!

Top of Page image